Home > Uncategorized > Picturelife moves again

Picturelife moves again


2016-03-24 10_10_48-Picturelife

Almost every other week, I take a look at the market to see whether there’s a suitable replacement for Picturelife.

This week I checked out Shutterfly and 23snaps, and came away disappointed. Aside from Google Photos, which I’ve already said I want to avoid, there is no replacement for Picturelife.

This morning, I was having a problem with Picturelife and so went to the Streamnation website, where I discovered that SN has shut down its service, and moved to a new project called Project Noah. Fortunately, Picturelife is part of that service, and so they’re apparently continuing the Picturelife product in the new service.

2016-03-24 10_09_12-Media Storage _ StreamNation


Given how long it has been since Picturelife was sold to Streamnation and discontinued development, it’s incredible that it’s still up and running – testament to the original team’s solid engineering and completeness of vision. There have been no new features or app updates on any platform since the sale 15 months ago, and yet the bugs and glitches that have crept in have been relatively minor.

However, it reaffirms the tenuousness of staying with a service where development has ceased.


The Transience of Clouds

It also reaffirms a fundamental nature of both clouds and cloud services – they do not persist, but drift and disperse. What may be a cool service today, will have either sold out and moved on by this time next year, or withered and died – even those backed by big brands.

2016-03-24 10_11_36-Dropbox Is Killing Mailbox And Carousel  _ Gizmodo Australia

Storing something that you’ll want to keep for more than a year – such as your family photos or documents – is still best left to a boring hard drive, with boring files stored in boring folders, and a boring naming convention. Anything else is a ticking timebomb, with your family’s most treasured and important possessions at risk.


Clinging on to Life

The painful thing is – Picturelife is so damn good!

It provides all the integration functions you would need – apps to upload, organisation features, editing features, and contextual displays such as geomaps – so you had the ease and accessibility of the cloud – but it kept your data exportable. With almost any other app out there, even if they do support exporting your photos, it will usually be without all the context that you’ve added over the years.

Picturelife was, and is, to an extent, open. You can create and share a URL with anyone without them having to sign up. You can download anything in its original form, anytime. You can use your own S3 storage rather than theirs, and ideally sync that back to your own hard drives with other tools, so you retain control and ownership of your photos. And the metadata and comments are open standard, and/or readable in Lightroom.

In a nutshell, it means you can access all your data and metadata, even if Picturelife disappeared one night – which evidently, it may do. And that, boring as it is, is what you want from a cloud service.


Categories: Uncategorized
  1. Thomas
    May 11, 2016 at 8:45 pm

    I loved Picturelife and i agree on Everything in your post. I now have all my photos in Google photo also, but the picturelife app is much better altough it is not updated since streamnation took over. The picturelife website is now unaccesable. but according to a tweet from picturelife it should be opened in 24 H. Still hoping the awesome app will continue developing. We will see..

    • damo
      May 12, 2016 at 12:44 am

      I think Google is a much better service since they have the automatic montages and facial recognition, even gallery RSS feeds, all for free.

      However, some of us don’t want Google to know every single thing about our lives – where we are, who we hang out with, who our family and kids are – all of which are in our photos, and that we know Google can and do read.

      Also, I’m not sure if Google allow me to export comments and face tags (other than from Picasa). My Mum’s old paper photos have names and details written on the back of them. Will my own photos still have that information when I look at them in 40 years time?

      For those of us who value our privacy, but still want to share some things, there’s Picturelife. Hopefully.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: